Neoplatonic essence and appearance

solar_eclipse_corona

(Neoplatonic) emanationist cosmology rests on the tenet—based to some extent in observation, but elevated by them to the status of a heuristic principle—that every activity in the world is in some sense double insofar as it possesses both an inner and an outer aspect. For example, the inner activity of the sun (nuclear fusion, as we now know) has the outer effect of heat and light, themselves activities as well. Or the inner activity of a tree that is determined by the kind of tree it is (its genetic code, we would now say; the Neoplatonists spoke of an inherent formative principle, logos) results in the bearing of a particular kind of fruit; or again, thoughts and feelings internal to human beings express themselves in speech and actions. In each case, the outer effect is not the purpose or end of the inner activity; rather, it is simply the case that one falls out of the other and is concomitant with it. Furthermore, it is also the case that these outer activities will typically be productive of yet other outer activities that are ontologically more remote and derivative: Fruit serves as nourishment or poison for other individual life forms, and human speech and action constitute, over time, a person’s biography or a society’s history. It is important to note that, in all cases, the outer activity will not be some random affair, but rather something intimately connected with the inner activity it is an expression of. In other words, any inner activity will somehow prefigure the character and nature of its outer effect. Thus, the Neoplatonists insisted that there is nothing on the lower ontological levels within the chains of causality that is not somehow prefigured on the corresponding higher levels. In general, no property emerges unless it is already in some way preformed and pre-existent in its cause.

red-star

Christian Wildberg, ‘Neoplatonism,’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Image

4 thoughts on “Neoplatonic essence and appearance

  1. I expect you know William Blake was influenced by Neoplatonic thought? I am presently studying the Book of Job and am amazed at the depth of Blake’s mythology – which is really all about self-knowledge!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hello Erik,

      mysticism, and particularly its primary Western form Neoplatonism, has had and continues to have the most profound effect on Western culture (I highly recommend William Franke’s 2 vol. anthology On What Cannot be Said which excellently exemplifies this).

      So many aspects of Western culture cannot be understood without first recognising this.

      The recognition of that influence has been systematically suppressed as an offence against ‘reason’ and ultimately, against the increasingly challenged Western supremacism – ‘We in the West reason, you study your navels etc.’.

      Academics in the humanities are responsible for the most gross failure of intellectual and social responsibility in this regard – those in philosophy are amongst the worst.

      Hegel, as just one example, was deeply dishonest in not acknowledging his debt to the Neoplatonic philosophers who preceded him – particularly Plotinus, Proclus and Cusanus.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s